01 March 2008

Placing Your Bets

What seems like ages ago in the late 90's I started building up my digital music collection and because of my close ties with Microsoft naturally I chose Windows Media Audio as the format I would support. Who knew?

Who knew that Microsoft would do such a piss-poor job of supporting digital technology? Who knew they'd see massive churn in their hardware expertise and completely screw-up their entrée into the music player market? Who knew they'd talk so freakin' long to make even token progress in car audio, phone audio, and personal devices? More's the sucker I.

Now I find myself with a library of more than 100,000 songs and the vast majority from online retailers who supported WMA. But I can't put the audio where I want it any more. I doesn't play well with my Nano, it won't play well in the car, it's a pain to work with on my phones. In short, I'm through suffering to support a format that has been so hideously mishandled.

So know I've been struggling with the easy way to convert ten thousand albums into MP3 format without losing the substantial investment I've made in ratings, album covers, categorization, and data clean-up. I'm notoriously picky about data, and my music collection is one of those places it shows the most. But seriously, convert 100K songs automatically with back-up and verification?

First off, I went a-hunting. I tried tool after tool, widget after widget, and spent some decent coin trying out even the more high-end utilities and packages. Generally speaking, they all are fine for the little guys, but when you are talking THOUSANDS of albums, they stop being useful.

So naturally, my engineering spirit erupted in full bloom and I've had to create several utilities to manage and control this process. Hundreds of hours later, I'm still not finished with the conversion process even though it is largely automatic with only a minimal set of smooth (to my mind) human verification steps.

The moral I learned from this adventure is to place your technology bets wisely. Had I given up after the first ASF debacle I would only have 40 or 50 gigabytes of music to manage instead of 600 GB of digital audio that needs to be handled with care.

Labels: , ,

What's been said:

post a new comment

What's been linked:

create a new link

24 April 2007

Walking and Talking

This week finds me taking a break from my normal work to rub shoulders with others in my profession, speaking geek with a passion.
The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.
-Herbert Spencer, English Philosopher (1820-1903)
One thing that becomes readily apparent whenever there are this many technobabblers in the same space is the difference between those who can talk the walk and those who can only walk the walk.

It is easy to overlook how wide the disparity between these two camps can grow.

Labels: ,

What's been said:

On 28 April, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said...

what does that really mean.... "walk the walk and talk the talk" ... sorry didnt understand :((

 
On 29 April, 2007, Blogger Tempus Fugate said...

Your talk is what you know or speak about something. To talk about something means you can speak about it. It is generally accepted that to know something of a subject you must be able to articulate that knowledge.

Your walk is what you actually do or accomplish. You can know about something but not be effective at using or applying that knowledge.

To talk the talk means you can speak about or you understand something that sounds good or is accepted as cool or interesting. This is different than being able to actually act on or use that information.

To walk the talk means you are actually doing the things you profess to believe or stand for. This generally refers to someone who absorbs information and puts it into practice while encouraging others to do the same.

To walk the walk means you are doing what is generally considered to be good or right, cool or interesting. This may be interchangeable with walking the talk, but is usually reserved for someone who is more concerned with the walk then the talk. For example, they may deliver consistently but don't feel the need to prattle on about it.

Consider some examples:

If someone wrote a book on a subject but had never applied that knowledge in a real-world situation we would say they Talk the Talk, but don't Walk the Talk.

If someone consistently performed a service but did so without expectation of recognition and without a fuss, we would say they Walk the Walk.

If someone was meeting real-world needs or performing services and also teaching and encouraging others in how to do the same that person would be Walking the Talk.

I hope this helps.

 
On 30 April, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous said...

yes it helped lots... it makes perfect sense.... thanks

 

post a new comment

What's been linked:

create a new link

28 April 2006

Engineering Lies

My current "paying-the-bills"-strategy involves working with a company that is doing offshore development.  I've been burning the candle at both ends trying to keep this engagement running smoothly.  Shortly I will have to spend a significant amount of time overseas to handle this fiasco.

Kawasaki recently posted "The Top Ten Lies of Engineers".  It was humorous but definitely struck a chord with my situation.  Specifically #8:
We can do this faster, cheaper, and better with an offshore programming team in India.
Rank and file engineers usually don't tell this lie; it's the CTO who does. Somehow we've got it in our heads that every programmer in India is good, fast, and cheap, and every programmer in the United States is lousy, slow, and expensive. My theory is that for version 1.0 of  a product, the maximum allowable distance between the engineers and marketers is thirty feet.
Once again, funny and insightful all in one go.

Labels:

What's been said:

post a new comment

What's been linked:

create a new link

: